# Infinite Intermediate Care Limited

Infinite Intermediate Care Limited is a CQC-regulated home-care agency in Peterborough.

## CQC Ratings

| Key question | Rating |
| --- | --- |
| Overall | Good |
| Safe | Good |
| Effective | Good |
| Caring | Good |
| Responsive | Good |
| Well-led | Good |

Rating published: 17/02/2022

## Practical info

- Postcode: PE1 2DU
- Registered manager: Patterson, Paulette
- Local authority: Peterborough
- Region: East
- City: Peterborough
- Last CQC check: 17/Feb/2022 - 00:00

## Inspection findings

### effective

- Finding
  - Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidance
  - Published: 2023-08-07

### Other

- Finding
  - Evidence: People were supported to access external healthcare services and the registered manager proactively noticed changes in health.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: No missed care calls reported; registered manager described as always on time.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: The registered manager knew people well, respected their dignity and independence, and promoted person-centred communication including use of objects of reference.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: Infection control procedures were in place and personal protective equipment was used consistently.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: Medicines were administered safely and in line with prescriber's instructions.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: Relatives described very positive relationships with the registered manager, with one saying they would give her '11 out of 10'.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **leadership** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: there was no-one else involved in running the service and there was no other oversight of the registered manager's practice.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **staff_training** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: the registered manager told us they received their last training in August 2017, 15 months earlier. This meant they may not be up to date with legislation and best practice.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **record_keeping** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: people's care plans did not consistently record these. This meant that if new staff provided people's care, they would not have sufficient guidance.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **care_planning** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: one person's care plan contained no information about the continence aid they used or the aids they used to help them drink independently.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **governance** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: The provider did not have adequate oversight of the service to ensure that people were provided with a high-quality, safe service.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **consent_capacity** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: Where people did not have the mental capacity to make decisions, processes had not have been followed to protect people from unlawful restriction and unlawful decision making.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: Mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions were now in place where needed, with families involved in decisions.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Evidence: Risk assessments were now in place for risks such as bed rails, diabetes and choking, meaning staff had information needed to care for people safely.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **safeguarding** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: New staff had sometimes been employed before all of their recruitment checks were returned. Care staff had been employed before their criminal records checked were returned and were working alone.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **leadership** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: Although the areas for improvement had been identified during previous inspections and discussed with the registered manager, action had still not been taken to make all of the required improvements.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **record_keeping** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Handwritten entries to the medicine charts had not included the name of the person making the entry and it had not been countersigned by another member of staff.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **governance** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: The provider's governance systems had failed to identify that the recruitment procedure had not always been followed and action had not been taken to request missing information.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **staff_competency** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: For the three members of staff who had been employed since the previous inspection; the registered manager was not able to produce a medication competency assessment however they were administering medicines unsupervised.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **staff_training** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: Staff were not completing their induction, core training and competency assessments as set by the provider before working with people unsupervised.
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- **medication_management** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: Staff still had not received training and competency assessments before administering medicines to people unsupervised. This meant that people may not receive their medicines as prescribed.
  - Published: 2023-08-07

### safe

- Finding
  - Assessing risk, safety monitoring and management
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Staffing and recruitment
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Using medicines safely
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Using medicines safely (Regulation 12 – Safe Care and Treatment)
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Staffing and recruitment (Regulation 19 – Fit and Proper Persons Employed)
  - Published: 2023-08-07

### well_led

- Finding
  - Managers and staff being clear about their roles, and understanding quality performance, risks and regulatory requirements
  - Published: 2023-08-07
- Finding
  - Managers and staff being clear about their roles, quality performance, risks and regulatory requirements (Regulation 17 – Good Governance)
  - Published: 2023-08-07

## Source

Data published by the [Care Quality Commission](https://www.cqc.org.uk/) under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Canonical page: https://homecarecompass.co.uk/agency/1-4024190762

HomeCare Compass is an independent guide and is not affiliated with the CQC.
