# J. Nissi Health Care and Medical Rehabilitation Ltd

J. Nissi Health Care and Medical Rehabilitation Ltd is a CQC-regulated home-care agency in London.

## CQC Ratings

| Key question | Rating |
| --- | --- |
| Overall | Insufficient evidence to rate |
| Safe | Insufficient evidence to rate |
| Effective | Insufficient evidence to rate |
| Caring | Not rated |
| Responsive | Insufficient evidence to rate |
| Well-led | Insufficient evidence to rate |

Rating published: 07/06/2023

## Practical info

- Postcode: W1G 9QN
- Registered manager: Akinlabi, Regina
- Local authority: Westminster
- Region: London
- City: London
- Last CQC check: 07/Jun/2023 - 00:00

## Inspection findings

### effective

- Finding
  - Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidance
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Supporting people to live healthier lives, access healthcare services and support
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Assessing people's needs and choices; delivering care in line with standards, guidance and the law
  - Published: 2025-12-12

### Other

- Finding
  - Evidence: A registered manager was in post at the time of inspection.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Evidence: An MCA policy was in place.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Evidence: Nutritional and hydration needs were assessed and recorded within care plans.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Evidence: Processes in place for the reporting of accidents and incidents.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **person_centred_care** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: there was no information about the people's background, family, likes, dislikes and hobbies which could provide staff with context.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **consent_capacity** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: we were unable to determine if the provider had the correct assessments in place to support people who lacked capacity.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **record_keeping** _(minor)_
  - Evidence: The registered manager was not recording people's oral health needs which meant staff would not know what people's daily oral healthcare was.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **governance** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: The service did not have quality assurance systems in place to monitor service delivery.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **end_of_life_care** _(minor)_
  - Evidence: the provider did not have a section within the care plan to record any relevant information regarding people's wishes.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **care_planning** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: there was limited information recorded about people's protected characteristics and people's overall health and medical history.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **care_planning** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Care plans were not personalised, and they provided limited information and guidelines for staff so they could meet people's needs and preferences.
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- **medication_management** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: within the provider's medicines policy there was no definition of what "prompting" entailed.
  - Published: 2025-12-12

### responsive

- Finding
  - End of life care
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Planning personalised care to ensure people have choice and control and to meet their needs and preferences
  - Published: 2025-12-12

### safe

- Finding
  - Learning lessons when things go wrong
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Assessing risk, safety monitoring and management
  - Published: 2025-12-12
- Finding
  - Using medicines safely
  - Published: 2025-12-12

### well_led

- Finding
  - Managers and staff being clear about their roles, and understanding quality performance, risks and regulatory requirements
  - Published: 2025-12-12

## Source

Data published by the [Care Quality Commission](https://www.cqc.org.uk/) under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Canonical page: https://homecarecompass.co.uk/agency/1-3865842946

HomeCare Compass is an independent guide and is not affiliated with the CQC.