# Jigsaw Homecare Ltd

Jigsaw Homecare Ltd is a CQC-regulated home-care agency in Mansfield.

## CQC Ratings

| Key question | Rating |
| --- | --- |
| Overall | Good |
| Safe | Good |
| Effective | Good |
| Caring | Good |
| Responsive | Good |
| Well-led | Good |

Rating published: 04/11/2025

## Practical info

- Postcode: NG19 9QH
- Registered manager: Wagstaff, Jayne
- Local authority: Nottinghamshire
- Region: East Midlands
- City: Mansfield
- Last CQC check: 04/Nov/2025 - 00:00

## Inspection findings

### Other

- Finding
  - Evidence: The registered manager was passionate about providing a high standard of care and acknowledged areas for improvement.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: People and families gave positive feedback about care staff, describing them as kind, friendly and respectful.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: All people and relatives confirmed staff wore full PPE throughout the pandemic.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Changes to care practice were put in place when things went wrong, such as a new policy for hospital discharges.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Systems were in place to investigate and monitor safeguarding concerns, with staff proactively raising concerns with the local authority.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Staff worked in partnership with other health and social care professionals.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **leadership** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: The registered manager had no oversight of governance for the service...The registered manager said they did not know this had been implemented.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **record_keeping** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Care plans shared with us had historic information in that was not relevant to the persons care needs at the time of the inspection.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **missed_or_late_visits** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Care was delivered at times in line with staff availability rather than people's choice.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **consent_capacity** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: There was no best interest decision visible on documents we reviewed. We requested copies of best interest decisions from the registered manager with no response.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **person_centred_care** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: The terminology on some care plans were written in a derogatory way. For example, 'do not ask person what they want to eat just go in the kitchen and make it'.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **infection_control** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: The providers infection control policy dated April 2020 had not been updated to include COVID-19.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **safeguarding** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: We found a number of incidents which were only discussed with an individual's social worker and not the safeguarding team. We were not assured the provider was following their own safeguarding policy effectively.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **incident_learning** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: We were not assured all notifications for incidents, such as, falls with hospital admissions had been submitted to CQC. We had not received any notifications for the service for 12 months.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **staffing_levels** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: One relative described a time due to the lack of staff their family member had been left without a lunch time call for a whole week.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **governance** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: The provider failed to ensure their systems and processes to monitor people's care was effective and could not assure the Commission they had good governance systems in place.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **care_planning** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: People's safety needs associated with their health conditions were not always effectively assessed or detailed in their care plan. We found not all risks were recorded.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **medication_management** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: The provider did not complete any medication audits for the electronic records. This meant they were not aware or managing discrepancies with medicines.
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Infection control training completed; staff wear appropriate PPE during calls
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Incident investigation processes now in place; registered manager reviews concerns and identifies improvements
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Registered manager actively sought feedback via questionnaires and took action on results
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Supervision and appraisals now in place; staff feel supported by management
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Call consistency improved; staff ring ahead if running late and calls are no longer being missed
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Safeguarding training completed; staff understood responsibilities to protect people and escalate concerns
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Safe recruitment practices implemented with DBS checks carried out on all staff
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- Finding
  - Evidence: Medicines administration improved; staff completed medicines training and had competency regularly checked
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **staff_training** _(minor)_
  - Evidence: Staff had not been trained specifically in the MCA, although this was covered in other modules of training they undertook
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **governance** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: we identified that whilst they monitored call times on the live system there was no audit in place
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **medication_management** _(minor)_
  - Evidence: there remained very little information for staff, such as detailed protocols [for 'when required' medicines]
  - Published: 2025-06-18
- **consent_capacity** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: People's records did not contain clear information about their capacity...no records of mental capacity assessments or best interest decisions
  - Published: 2025-06-18

## Source

Data published by the [Care Quality Commission](https://www.cqc.org.uk/) under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Canonical page: https://homecarecompass.co.uk/agency/1-1453448516

HomeCare Compass is an independent guide and is not affiliated with the CQC.
