# CARE 24/7 SOLUTIONS LIMITED

*Operated by Care 24/7 Solutions Limited.*

CARE 24/7 SOLUTIONS LIMITED is a CQC-regulated home-care agency in Swindon.

## CQC Ratings

| Key question | Rating |
| --- | --- |
| Overall | Good |
| Safe | Good |
| Effective | Good |
| Caring | Good |
| Responsive | Good |
| Well-led | Good |

Rating published: 17/12/2025

## Practical info

- Postcode: SN2 2AZ
- Local authority: Swindon
- Region: South West
- City: Swindon
- Last CQC check: 17/Dec/2025 - 00:00

## Inspection findings

### Other

- Finding
  - Evidence: The service had recently increased quality assurance questionnaires to monthly frequency.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Evidence: Spot checks were undertaken to monitor safe staff practice and PPE adherence.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Evidence: Team meetings were used to promote open culture, good practice and staff communication.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Evidence: Daily medicines audit checks were being completed regularly and identifying some issues.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Evidence: A new electronic care records system was introduced, improving governance and family communication via an app.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Evidence: Provider was responsive to inspection feedback; management completed level 4 safeguarding training after the visit.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Evidence: Most people and relatives felt care was safe and staff were kind, caring and compassionate.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **person_centred_care** _(minor)_
  - Evidence: A safeguarding document stated a person 'uses all kinds of tricks' to decline care...records described them as 'little bit tricky' and said they would 'finally play victims of poor care'.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **supervision_appraisal** _(minor)_
  - Evidence: The supervision matrix did not always match up with the supervision forms in staff files.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **staffing_levels** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: The rotas we reviewed did not give staff sufficient travel time. One staff had back-to-back visits where no travel time had been allocated, however visit locations were 30 minutes away.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **communication_with_families** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Professionals told us they did not always receive a timely response to emails, and a professional noted instances where the service had failed to arrive at planned joint visits.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **leadership** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post. The nominated individual had submitted an application to be appointed as the registered manager.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **incident_learning** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Systems were not operated to analyse accidents/incidents, complaints and safeguarding concerns to identify trends or themes.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **staff_competency** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: The medication competency assessment workbook answers we reviewed were populated with internet responses. We were not assured this was an adequate process to assess staff competency.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **staff_training** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Staff had completed significant amounts of hours of training of many different subjects in 1 day...1 staff on 9 March 2023 had spent 15 and a half hours training.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **record_keeping** _(moderate)_
  - Evidence: Some records were incomplete, outdated, or inaccurate...some information was inaccessible because the service was unable to access emails of a former staff member.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **governance** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: Audits had not been fully effective in driving improvement...care plan audits contained repeated actions without evidence of resolution.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **infection_control** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: The service had not established or effectively implemented robust infection prevention and control procedures to effectively mitigate risk to people.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **care_planning** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: Risk assessments were either not present, had not been updated in a timely manner, or lacked sufficient detail to help staff understand and respond to risks.
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- **medication_management** _(critical)_
  - Evidence: MARs did not always represent an accurate record of all prescribed medicines and topical creams administered...1 person's MAR had been used for training/demo purposes.
  - Published: 2024-01-03

### safe

- Finding
  - Staffing and recruitment
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Learning lessons when things go wrong
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Preventing and controlling infection
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Using medicines safely
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Assessing risk, safety monitoring and management
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Systems and processes to safeguard people from the risk of abuse
  - Published: 2024-01-03

### well_led

- Finding
  - Engaging and involving people using the service, the public and staff, fully considering their equality characteristics
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Promoting a positive culture that is person-centred, open, inclusive and empowering
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - How the provider understands and acts on the duty of candour; Working in partnership with others
  - Published: 2024-01-03
- Finding
  - Managers and staff being clear about their roles, understanding quality performance, risks and regulatory requirements; Continuous learning and improving care
  - Published: 2024-01-03

## Source

Data published by the [Care Quality Commission](https://www.cqc.org.uk/) under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Canonical page: https://homecarecompass.co.uk/agency/1-10352652735

HomeCare Compass is an independent guide and is not affiliated with the CQC.
